🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are watching closely to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a rising number of states are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". Legislation could be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "an measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on parliament to enact a bill increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar step, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged parents to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory motion demanding a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is granted. Even though it highlights of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a good foundation," stated the MEP behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Last year, momentum grew behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing dangerous platform posts contends that a blanket age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to design tools that are safe and suitable for young users," stated a prominent peer.

The US: A State-by-State Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the regional level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a measure banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law capping minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from certain politicians to mimic the Australian example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond the West, other nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies adopt a more measured stance. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

While this international discussion continues, the steps of Australia and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.